An expansion pack closing the coverage gaps in the humanities, social sciences, applied mathematics, medicine, and computer science
This pack answers a systematic omission audit of the atlas. Each entry meets the existing bar — a well-posed question or a real established result, with rival positions or significance and the operative obstruction. Contested fields are mapped neutrally: for philosophy of race and gender, non-Western and continental philosophy, applied ethics, and religious studies, the entry states the serious rival positions and adjudicates none. Covering these areas this way strengthens the rigor claim; covering them as endorsement would be the opposite failure.